HOME TWITTER FACEBOOK RESOURCES ROSTER SCHEDULE ARCHIVES CONTACT TICKETS
Jul 27
2011
12:05 AM

by Brian
http://www.depressedfan.com/img/dwighthoward072711.jpg
Over the past couple days in the comments, the conversation has continually drifted to contention. How can the Sixers get from here to there? Is contention just a pipe dream? Is there anything the new owners can do to move the needle? Well, there's one clear path to relevance. Dwight Howard.

Get Howard and you can pencil yourself in as a contender. Even playing with Gilbert Arenas and Hedo Turkoglu, you simply couldn't discount the Magic last season, and you won't be able to count them out whenever we have basketball again. They aren't going to win it as currently constructed, but they could beat anyone in a seven game series and they could win 60 games. Howard is that good.

For the Sixers, he also happens to be a perfect fit. Put him in the middle and they're suddenly the best defensive team in the league, capable of putting a defensive squad out there with no holes and the best center in the game to cover up for the few mistakes the other guys make. Put him in the middle and suddenly Thad's rebounding and Lou's questionable effort don't really matter, he'll make up for them. Put him in the middle on the other end and suddenly the lobs Jrue and Iguodala throw up won't be bouncing off their center's head, they'll be thrown down. The easiest points in the world.

The question isn't whether Howard would instantly make the Sixers a contender, he would. It's not a debate. The question is how could the Sixers possibly get him?

I see four possible routes, none of which are even the least bit likely, but let's discuss anyway:

Trade this season: Howard may very well force his way out of Orlando, but there's no way he's going to force his way to Philly. If Howard is available in any way, shape or form, the Sixers absolutely need to be on the phone immediately, but there's a caveat. Howard has and ETO on his contract, he can become a free agent after next season. If there's no franchise tag in the next CBA, the Sixers could very well be giving up a boatload to rent Howard for whatever's left of an abbreviated season. This move, obviously carries a tremendous amount of risk. Here's my only stipulation. I'd include absolutely anyone on the roster and any number of future draft picks to get Howard if Howard agrees to a max extension with the Sixers as a condition of the trade. If Howard won't agree to an extension, I'd give up absolutely anything, except Jrue. The tradeoff is what you're willing to take back. This is a pretty simple answer as well, if Howard is willing to sign a max extension, I'd take back whatever Orlando could shoehorn into the deal. If you're guaranteed to have Howard for five years, I don't care what you have to do, you get him. If there's a decent chance this is going to be a one-year rental (or less), then you can't take back too much garbage and you absolutely must keep Jrue. Jrue is the key selling point in getting Howard to re-up in Philly, and he's also a modest safety net if he does wind up walking.

I think there's a modest chance the Sixers could put together a deal that would entice Orlando into pulling the trigger (they could offer youth, picks and cap relief), but I find it highly unlikely that they'd be able to get Howard to agree to an extension. I also think the odds of Howard opting out of a $19M+ year on his current deal are pretty low. The max won't pay him that much under the next CBA, so trading for him as a rental would be a similar situation to what the Nets did with Deron Williams this past season, and that's a risk I would take if Jrue wasn't included in the deal. Give me 18 months of playing with Jrue and if Howard wants to walk, I'm fine with that. I'll start over from scratch. The caveat here is the CBA. If a franchise tag is included, everyone and everything is on the table. Then again, if there's a franchise tag available, Orlando won't be trading Howard.

Trade next season: On the one hand, the Sixers would have more assets in terms of expiring contacts next season, on the other hand, I think you'd have more legitimate bidders in play for Howard when he was definitely headed for free agency. There's more risk involved, unless there's a tremendous advantage in the new version of Bird Rights because you don't have that second year left on his deal, but the price I'm willing to pay and the garbage I'm willing to take back with him are still the same. The same conditions apply. Again, highly unlikely.

Free agency next summer: Zero chance of this happening. The Sixers don't have the pure cap space and I don't think they'd be able to force Orlando into a sign and trade, Howard would have to be dying to come to Philly. Maybe there's an outside chance the Sixers continue their upward trend and Jrue (and/or Turner) make a tremendous leap this season to the point where Howard decides he's the missing piece to bring a title to Philly. Even if that's the case, he'd pretty much have to force his way to Philly and the Sixers would have to give up a decent salary to be able to make the trade work.

Free agency in summer of 2013: Here it is, probably the last, best chance to get Howard (assuming he hasn't already signed a max contract/extension elsewhere. The Sixers will have Iguodala (player option that season), Turner, Brackins, the Voose and next summer's first round draft pick under contract for $28M. Jrue will be heading into restricted free agency with a cap hold of around $8M which brings the total up to $36M. If they've re-signed Thad or Speights long term, or added any other contracts in the interim, they'll also take away from that number, but unless something monumental happens, they should have at least $20M in cap space with the ability to make a big move with Iguodala's expiring contract if need be. They could afford Howard without question, they'll probably be able to afford Howard and a couple of other good players to fill out their roster. They'd have Jrue at 23, Turner at 25, Iguodala for one year at 30 and Howard at 28.

Again, it's unlikely they'd be able to lure Howard on the open market. But, and there's always a but, if Jrue and/or Turner can elevate their games in the next two seasons to where one or both of them (or someone else on the roster) is a borderline All Star, maybe you've got something here. Maybe Joshua Harris and the new owners have turned things around. Maybe Jrue really is a top five point guard, Doug Collins is still going strong and this team is on the rise. If everything breaks perfectly, maybe Howard could see Philly as his ticket to a ring and maybe he'll also see Philly as his for the taking at that point.

When I look at four complete long shots, the fourth maybe doesn't look as long (or as risky) as the others. When it comes right down to it, though, I'd probably be willing to take whatever risk is necessary to get Howard.

25
Comments

Leave a
comment

I guess I like Howard more than you (or like Jrue less), but I think that for me Jrue is not a deal breaker in getting Howard.

We still don’t know what will happen with this coming season but if you think that DH will stay another season (like you said, “I also think the odds of Howard opting out of a $19M+ year on his current deal are pretty low”), then is a team build around DH, Iguodala and Brand is a serious contender in the 12/13 season? I would give Jrue for a good chance for a championship.

Also, if the team is contending (unlike Orlando in the last couple of years), what are the chances that Howard will want to stay here with Iguodala instead of Jrue? Can you build a contender around those 2 for a few more years?

Jrue and Dwight toured together last month- so maybe the hard sell has already begun. At least you can try and believe that.

I agree with your thinking. The only situation that you cannot risk is renting Dwight for a year and then lose him and still be stuck with terrible contracts like Arenas or Hedo. But any other scenario is good one- even if you lose Jrue.

user-pic
deepsixersuede +/-

Brian, my expectations are a bit lower and I hope we can get one of the future top 5 centers/power forwards in the league through free agency without losing assets in a trade.

Who and what are your top 5 after Dwight? Can Favors at the p.f., if our center pans out put us in contention 2 years from now?

If Dwight Howard isn't available, how would you feel about trading for Andrew Bogut?

With him we would surpass Boston, but may not be good enough to beat Miami. We would be a top 3 team and a fun team to watch. His contract doesn't expire till 2014 and he's only making around 12-13 mill/season. How much are you willing to give up for him?

Summer 2013 could be very exciting and it will all depend on how much Jrue and Turner will develop. As of right now, I only see 5 other teams that will have both the salary cap and complementary players to lure in Howard:

OKC:
Payroll: 31.4 million
RFAs: James Harden, Serge Ibaka, Russell Westbrook(2012)

NJ:
Payroll: 7 mill
FAs: Deron Williams
RFAs: Brook Lopez (2012)

LAC:
Payroll: 0
FAs: Al-Farouq Aminu (TO), Eric Bledsoe (TO)
RFAs: Blake Griffin, Eric Gordon (2012)

NOH:
Payroll: 22 million
FAs: Chris Pauk

WAS: 15.2 million

It's near impossible to determine who will have salary and or assets that far down the line when the CBA is no longer existing.

Not to mention, no one really thought two years ago they'd be looking at a team in Miami with Lebron, Dwyane and Chris Bosh.

The landscape can change mightily between now and then, and if the younger Buss stops being such an idiot, Howard might play for the Lakers next season whenever it occurs

I would love to get Howard but the chances are very slim. I think there is a much better chance of getting A. Bynum from LA. I see that as a possibility as soon as the season begins.

It's not really a possibility, the sixers don't have want the Lakers would want to trade Bynum (Dwight Howard)

The rumored Lakers/Sixers talks involved Odom, not Bynum. Buss Jr has a hard on for Bynum and purportedly won't even consider him in a swap for Howard, why would he consider him for any of the lesser pieces on the sixers roster?

Maybe the sixers could get W Bynum?

what the lakers, not want the lakers

This is sad. There is only one player that will be available within the next 3 years that can make our team a contender.

I don't think that he's the only one - either by trade or free agency - just probably the biggest one. Additionally, I don't think howard makes the sixers a real title contender - they'd probably win 50 (depending on what they gave up) but there's no guarantee that they'd get out of the second round.

Lebron James
Kevin Durant
Dwayne Wade
Kobe Bryant
Derrick Rose
Dirk Nowitzki
Pau Gasol

-Other than Howard, those are the only guys in the NBA right now that would make us contenders. I don't see how any of them will become available

No one player makes the sixers contenders right now

I disagree. Put Dwight Howard on this team without losing any pieces and the Sixers are legit contenders immediately.

Still starting a back up at the 2 and an elton brand whose career is on the down slope with no power forward to start next to howard. Still have a weak bench with no defensive stopper and oh yeah - not a whole lot of out side threats.

I'm talking about contending for a title.

how is putting Howard on the sixers without losing anyone (an impossibility until brands contract ends so you have no power forward) making the sixers better than the magic of the last few years?

Thinking the sixers are 'one player away' is what BIlly King did for years, and it's not true in my opinion. Not one player away from having an nba finals appearance as the favorite

Not to mention the likelihood of adding howard without losing anything is unlikely - in terms of trade of course, no way to say how the new free agency will work

I was responding to your comment that no one player could make them a contender. That was false. If you want to put conditions on your statement, then you can probably make it true.

The difference between adding Howard to the current Sixers team and the team that Orlando put on the floor is

1: The Sixers have defenders elsewhere, Orlando doesn't
2: The Sixers have two very good playmakers in Iguodala and Jrue, guys who can and will set Howard up with easy looks. Orlando has none.

A starting lineup of Howard, Brand, Iguodala, Meeks and Jrue is a legit contender imo. Contending for a championship. It's impossible, so this whole conversation is pointless, but in some bizarre universe where they could add one player without subtracting, they'd be a contender.

I consider a contender a team that can challenge to win a championship

That's a contender. Dwight Howard doesn't make this team a championship contender by himself. The 'conditions' as you stated them are the reason why they aren't a championship contender just by adding Howard

user-pic
eddies' heady's replied to comment from Brian +/-

You left out one important thing

ORL has shooters, we don't

I guess it depends on what system you want to employ. Whether you think the magic's system of surrounding Howard with one dimensional shooters is the ideal- or whether a system based on having multiple weapons who can break down the defense before getting the ball to Howard is better.

Personally, I think only having shooters who can never get past their defenders can only take you so far. Because teams can take away the shooters and force Howard to beat them by himself. Howard gets huge numbers in that scenario but the team struggles. On the flip side, having guys like Iggy, Jur, ET, Lou and Turner who can all break down their men forces the defense to help. And when the help Howard is in a better position to devastate. In the games I watched, Howard was most effective when Jameer got in the lane. But when they settled for jacking up 3's they struggled.

Of course the best would be to have a blend of shooters and drivers. Bother the Sixers and Orlando have issues with balance. But i would not say that the Magic's supporting cast is better suited for Dwight.

So lets say that you resign Thad, Jrue, pick up the option on Turner and still have enough money to sign Howard. If Howard doesn't sign or if we can't get any other "superstars", would you then trade Iguodala?

Yeah, I mean I don't think anyone's saying Iguodala is untouchable at any point. When I say don't trade Iguodala, I just say don't trade him for crap. He's valuable on this team. If they get to that summer and have the cap space to make a major signing but can't, then you have other options because Iguodala is an expiring contract the following season. A ton of cap space and a big expiring contract could allow you to make two big time moves in the trade market.

user-pic
deepsixersuede +/-

At 10 oclock on the big ten network they are replaying an E.Turner college game, if anyone is in need of a hoop fix.

Wrong info on tv guide, this years buckeyes, sorry.


Expand/Contract all comments


Leave a comment


HOME TWITTER - follow me on Twitter for timely updates and quick links. FACEBOOK - become a fan on Facebook, upload photos from games, reach out to other fans, plan field trips. RESOURCES - all the links you need in one place. ROSTER - salary cap and roster information with links to player archives. SCHEDULE - all 82 games, your entrance to the new game pages. ARCHIVES - monthly and a complete list of tag archives CONTACT - send me a link, drop me a line, inquire about advertising on Depressed Fan. CONTENT USAGE POLICY - Rules for using Depressed Fan content elsewhere. BLOGS BY FANS - check out the entire Blogs By Fans network - Sports Blogs, The Way They Were Meant To Be. SITEMAP - just in case you get lost
©2013 Blogs By Fans | Design by Brian Ward

Expand  /  Toggle
Leave a comment