by Brian on December 12, 2007 at 11:04PM
ESPN.com has a new feature they're touting today in which David Thorpe from Scouts Inc. rates the rookies in the NBA and gives a glimpse into his thoughts on their futures and development so far.

The Sixers' rooks, Jason Smith and Thad Young ranked numbers 13 and 17 respectively (they were drafted #20 and #12 respectively, so they're ranked higher than their cumulative draft places).

Here's what he had to say about each Sixers rook:

Jason Smith - PER 11.56
Too much is made of where a player went to college, as if only the high majors play a tough brand of basketball. Smith went to Colorado State, a team that never had much national success, but when he first caught the ball the other night against Houston at the high post, he went right at Yao Ming and finished a strong layup over him. No ACC player could have done any better.

Thaddeus Young - PER 16.57
] Young reminds me of a younger Josh Smith -- a wildly athletic and rangy forward with no real sense of how to play the game. Yet. His upside is considerable, but so is his downside. Being a student of the game should be priority No. 1 for Young.

Thorpe also highlights a few memorable plays made by rookies in the past week, here's one about Smith:

The best play I saw was when Jason Smith contested a 3-point shot in the corner opposite the Knicks' bench and then beat everyone down the floor to convert the fast-break pass into a sweet two-handed dunk. Yes, he made three plays -- contest, race and finish. That's how you earn rotation time.

All told, I can't say I disagree with his assessment, I'm a little higher on Thad than he is, but it's hard for me to tell if my Sixers' bias is tinting my view of him.



Also on the Network:
√ Brandon Jennings Update [Stop Mike Lupica]
√ Deja Vu It Is [Depressed Fan]
√ You, Me and D. Lee [El Lefty Malo]





[December 13, 2007 11:21 AM]  |  link  |  reply
The GM said

PER is an overrated stat. Glen Davis is leading all rookies in PER?? Daequan Cook is second?? Those two things tell me that the stat is garbage.

[December 13, 2007 12:37 PM]  |  link  |  reply
Brian said

Yep, I'm not a huge fan of PER, but that's the system they used. It may be a more useful stat when you're talking about guys with a ton of minutes, but it's such a small sample size here that the numbers are basically meaningless.

[December 13, 2007 8:18 PM]  |  link  |  reply
The GM said

Agreed...but I do like the potential of Philly's two rookies, regardless of made up numbers.