Predicting 2010: Samuel DalembertMeeting with the coach in Orlando. Showing up for team workouts at PCOM. A new attitude, a new work ethic. Will the new and improved Sam Dalembert show up for 82 games, or will he backslide? We'll try to sort it all out after the jump in today's portion of the Projecting 2010 Series.
Defense first. Defense, defense, defense. And some more defense. If this team is going to have a calling card. If they're going to not only make the playoffs, but make noise once they get to the playoffs, it's not going to be because the Princeton Offense turned them into an elite offensive team, it's going to be because their defense absolutely stifled their opponents. The PO is there to move them from a passable offensive team to a decently effective one. That's all they should need if they run with their best defensive lineup for a majority of the minutes. Simply put, if Sam Dalembert is not on the floor, they are not an elite defense. Coach Jordan has come right out and said this is a defensive roster and he will dole out minutes accordingly. He said time and time again that the PO can run with Sammy or around him. Everyone seems to be impressed with Sam's attitude, including Ed Stefanski. Randy Ayers was brought in to work the defensive system. All signs point toward heavy minutes for Sam as the anchor of the defense, a guy who will get opportunity baskets within the offense and clean the glass on both ends. Still, I have a nagging feeling that this isn't going to turn up roses. Sam's offensive skills are lacking, to put it kindly, and he's just the sort of guy who can throw a monkey wrench into an actual offensive system. I just don't know how much of that Eddie Jordan is going to be able to stomach. Sam should be playing as much as 35 minutes a night for this team. Simple as that, he's their best option at the five, really the only option who's shown the ability to rebound, block shots and handle a low-post threat down on the blocks. When all is said and done, though, I think he'll wind up at about 27 minutes per game, and I think we're going to be hearing about it in the press. Again. ![]() Sam's numbers will be up across the board, but his minutes won't be up enough. I expect we'll see far fewer jumpers from the foul line, and more easy slams on alley-oops from both pick-and-roll and back-door lobs to the weak side. His FG% should really jump more than I'm predicting here, but you can't dismiss his track record of taking bad shots. They won't completely disappear. You can say plenty of bad things about Sam, but one thing you have to admit is that he produces. Even when he's sulking, he's rebounding. Even when he's lamenting his lack of touches on the offensive end, he's swatting shots. Even when he's goaltending, he's intimidating. I firmly believe the Sixers will get production out of Dalembert, production that demands minutes. I'm just worried the other stuff is going to take those minutes away. Thoughts in the comments, full series here.
Latest Posts• Twelve is Looming • More Distractions • Moving Day • There Is a Precedent • First-Person Report: Sixers vs. Pistons • At Least It Wasn't the Threes • Our Weakness is Weaker Than Yours • Thriving At the Two? • Eddie Jordan Confidence Meter (1/4 Seaso • The Day After • Sixers All Over NBA.com Video • First-Person Report: Sixers vs. NuggetsSearchBlogs in The NetworkSixers BlogsPassion and Pride Sixers 4 Guidos Liberty Ballers Recliner GM PhillyArena Heard In The Cheap SeatsSilver Dollar Slots | ||||||||||||||||
I'm quite opimistic about Sam's offense this year given that he will playing with Lou/Holiday and not Miller. Miller was always freezing him out and when Lou was in the game, many times 3rd or 4th quarters, he would find him down low or on the alley oop.
The big thing about Sam as always is foul trouble, hopefully that will determine his playing time and not a small ball hungry coach that we've seen the past several years.
That's a valid point about Miller. Not sure if he was 100% responsible, but there were definitely times that he would lock people out of the offense. Usually, it was called for and the guy who wouldn't get the ball was Willie (or Evans). Could've been the coaches as well, though, so who knows, either way it could improve.
The bigger issue last year was the coaches only allowing Sammy 4 fouls for the entire game. 2 in the first, then he sat. A total of 4 at any time in the second half, and he was done for the game.
I am somewhat hopefully that Brand and Dalembert will bring the best out of each other. It's kind of like a poor man's version of the two Wallaces for Detroit in 2003-05.
Dalembert gives the length and athleticism while Brand brings the strength and toughness. And both of them can rebound well.
I don't expect anything from Daly offensively to be honest, except a couple of offensive boards a game as well as the occasional putback. If he can stay foul-free and reduce the boneheaded plays he'll be an asset to this team.
They had great success playing next to each other last year, before Brand's injury. At least in the defense/rebounding departments they did.
Brian: agreed
for the life of me i dont get why many people think Sam is only a detriment to this team. i guess maybe he is easy to dislike and has a somewhat enigmatic/fragile personality. anyway his greatest problem last year was his offensive liability whihc was basically bcos we run ISOs everywhere and he cant do much on his own.he should do much better this year.
Sam is seen as a detriment to the team because he is terrible offensively, thinks he isn't and in the past 3-5 years has shown very little if any improvement in his understanding of the fundamentals of basketball (be it boxing out, passing, dribbling, etc...)
I don't expect Sam to be any better or any worse than last season - he'll do - you won't win a title with him - but this team isn't a title contender yet anyway - all this off season stuff is nice (and awfully public isn't it?) but I am not so easily convinced that one off season makes a difference after how many wasted off seasons?