The Three-Point Difference![]() Atop everyone's offseason wish list for the Sixers is a three-point shooter. This isn't going to be another post about who could possibly fill that role, instead, we're going to try to take a statistical look at how hard it will be to meet the need. Let's get some perspective on the situation first. The Sixers averaged 4.2 made threes on 13.1 attempts, good for 31.8%. Their makes/game were 2nd to last in the league (only OKC made fewer), their attempts were also second to last (again, OKC was the only team to attempt fewer). They were dead last in percentage. The league-average three-point percentage was 36.7%. In Sixers wins, they averaged 4.5 made threes on 12.3 attempts, good for 36.5%. In losses, they averaged 3.8 made threes on 13.8 attempts, good for 27.5%. They shot better at home (33.1%) than on the road (30.6%). So when we talk about the need for improved three point shooting, exactly how much improvement is needed? If they were able to make 2 more threes per game, that would push their average up to 6.2, good for 20th in the league. Three more threes per game and they'd be 10th. The raw numbers don't tell the whole story, obviously. In fact, three of the bottom four teams in threes made per game (Philadelphia, Detroit and Utah) all made the playoffs. The team who made the most threes per game didn't even sniff the post season (New York). If you go by percentages, the teams left standing were ranked #2 (Cleveland), #6 (Orlando), #13 (Denver) and #20 (Lakers). In fact, 8 of the 16 playoff teams were in the bottom half of the league in three-point percentage. Five of those eight were knocked out in the first round, the other three advanced. From a purely statistical standpoint, I'm not sure where you'd rank three-point shooting. It's a completely mixed bag when you look at it from a long view. However, I think we can all agree that when you look at the micro, the ability to hit the three is absolutely necessary in today's NBA. It opens up the lane for drives, it eases pressure on your post players, it swings momentum. it punishes teams for mistakes. The Sixers have been on the wrong side of all of these advantages far too many times. Now let's take a look at where the Sixers' threes came from:
Using the numbers above, that would put the Sixers roster as it currently stands at 318 made threes, 193 short of the goal of 6.2 per game. Here's the list of guys who hit a minimum of 193 threes last season:
If you think a trade can act as a silver bullet, say by replacing Andre Miller's minutes with Kirk Hinrich, well, Hinrich's career high was 145. There's another piece to the puzzle here. Willie Green played 1,828 minutes last season. That number will be cut drastically, however the bulk of his minutes will probably (or at least should probably) go to Elton Brand with Thad moving to the three and Iguodala moving to the two. Ostensibly, that means one fewer three-point shooter on the floor. This is why I think the key is going to be getting a point who can knock down the three, to be more precise, the key is going to be to get a three-point shooter who can also run the point. Let's go back to Hinrich for a second. If the Sixers were somehow able to land him, and they reconfigured their offense enough to get 145 threes out of him, then this type of improvement would be possible, especially if they'd also be willing to give some of Ivey, Lou and Willie's minutes to a shooter they drafted or acquired through the MLE. Another option would be to trade up for Stephen Curry and give him 5 or 6 attempts from three per game. If there's a rook out there who I think could step in and shoot close to 40% from three, it's Curry, but I'm beating a dead horse on that one at this point. The point of this convoluted post is that it's going to either take a big move with a big payoff, several smaller moves or some kind of drastic improvement from the guys on the roster right now to change the Sixers from a dreadful three-point shooting team to simply a below-average three-point shooting team in 2009-2010. Honestly, I don't think the odds are good in any case, and I'd say it'll be nearly impossible for the Sixers to shake things up enough using only the MLE and the #17 pick. It's going to take some kind of trade, some kind of drastic move to improve the shooting on this team enough to make a dent. You'll notice that I haven't dealt in three-point percentage for the bulk of this post, mainly because if we were talking about raising the number of threes made and percentages the math would've taken up more words than I'm willing to use. Put it this way, though. If the Sixers get a shooter who hits two threes per game and drops their team-wide average, they've made a horrible, horrible miscalculation, not only in who they drafted/signed, but in the direction of their offense. If that's the case, at this time next season we'll be much more intersted in the draft, because we'll be a lottery team. Of that, I'm sure.
Latest Posts• The Truth About Sam • Dei Is Out, Donyell In • 10 Games at a Time • Sixers Preseason Stats • Depressed Fan Field Trip • Sixers Hosed By N.J. • Does This Sound Familiar? • Putting A Bow on the Preseason • Rough Day For Christmas • Anyone In New York? • Sixers Pick Up Three Options • And Then There Were 13SearchBlogs in The NetworkSixers BlogsPassion and Pride Sixers 4 Guidos Liberty Ballers Recliner GM PhillyArena Heard In The Cheap SeatsSilver Dollar Slots | ||||||||||||||
Brian, getting a coach with a better defensive plan may allow us to play guys that have the ability to hit the 3, but not defend well.[Kopono,as an example]. A new offense with less dribbling and more screening and cutting, along with a healthy Elton may get more open looks for this team as well,again the new coach will be the key.I disagree about Donyell, I hope he is back and allowed to play the R.Horry role in more games, but less long minute stretches.He has a knack for coming off the bench cold and burying a three, which is hard to find,especially in a young player.Coming out of draft night with two guys that can shoot,and play in the backcourt is the best possible scenerio and possible by just buying a late first for a future first or cash.Calathes leaving hurts but there are guys available there.I!ll throw one more Spieghts trade out there although I would rather they not move him.Minnesota has Foye,M.Miller and Carney on their wings and will probably be taking a backcourt player with their first pick.At #18 they would probably like to go big,and if Spieghts is better to them than J.Johnson or Mullins would we do a Spieghts for #18 and C.Brewer deal. If we came out of this draft with Brewer,Lawson[#17] and either Ellington or Thornton at[#18] would that be enough of an improvement in your eyes.
Brewer is a bad, bad idea for the Sixers. It would take a lot of work to make a trade to make the shooting on this team worse, trading for Brewer would accomplish that.
The only way I move Speights is if it lands us Curry or a guy like Hinrich.
Deep,
Good post.I do agree with something Brian said which the pundits here in Philly don't. Every writer, journalist,etc. has said that Iguodala is not a 2 he is a 3 and it won't work with him and Thad in the lineup. I totally disagree and think if the Sixers can land a point guard with 3 point range,that would be the best situation for them. I think that situation would really allow them to spread the floor and play inside out with Brand. This also gives them their best defensive team.
Well, one of the guys in the draft I thought would be a good fit for the Sixers is gone. Nick Calathes is going to Greece:
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=4201710
I thought he'd be a good fit for the Sixers with his shooting, passing and high basketball IQ.
Such a crazy turn of events.
I guess I don't blame him. He's getting mid-1st money, a house, a car and no tax. I'm somewhat surprised with those deals the NBA isn't losing more players like this or Childress.
That being said, now I'm hoping for Maynor if they stick where they are in the draft. Quick question, with Rubio saying he might not want to leave Spain do you think the Sixers could move up and get Rubio? Would we want to?
The NBA is still the best professional basketball league in the NBA - there's a lot less risk of violence in the stands and you don't ever 'not' get paid - both things that can happen in euoprean ball...
Good post Brian,
Although, if Thad can shoot everywhere from three what he shoots at home(40%), that would improve their effectiveness, especially if he can do it in volume. Plus, I have hopes that Lou might get back to the mid-30s as well. Iguodala needs more catch-and-shoot threes and less pull-ups and step-back attempts. I hope he can refine that shot. He twitted about going to ATTACK gym to put up some shots. You never know, maybe he can get to the mid-30's, nearly average shooting.
I have an interest in a few possible free agents that could help. Kyle Korver has said that if any team shows an interest in him, he's opting out. Would you be interested in Kyle's return? As a 6th man, he could be quite effective.
Another player that might be available and could hit some threes is Rodney Carney. He would be cheaper than Korver, for sure, but he is a much better defender, though not as good of a shooter.
The third is a bit of a wild card candidate: Boki Nachbar. He played in Russia this year, and things did not go well due to the Economic collapse. He can shoot, finish at the rim(just ask Sam) and has a connection with Ed Stef from NJ.
What do you guys think?
I would say yes to Korver, provided we have already addressed the PG position. Yes to Carney if they sign him for the minimum or bi-annual.
Nachbar, I don't know, I never really saw enough of him. From the numbers, it looks like he did a nice job of stretching the floor. Above-average three-point shooter. It would depend on how much he'd cost.
Brian, he shot last year [Brewer] more like he did at Flor. and stepped up big in big games for Flor. in the tournament.They tried to change his form [ugly] his rookie year but last year,before he got hurt was pretty effective.I think he is a real good catch and shoot guy and defensively we know what he can be.
I'm with Brian on this one, Brewer would be terrible for us. We can throw out this year's shooting numbers (he only attempted 12 3-pt shots this season) and focus on his rookie year, when he had the second-worst TS% at his position in the entire NBA. Now, a year later coming off major knee-surgery, why would he be any better.
True, he's a good defender. But read what John Hollinger had to say about his offensive game:
"Brewer has a high dribble and seems to lose his balance a lot when he tries to drive; he's also incredibly thin, so using his size in the post is a nonstarter. His offensive numbers were unimpressive even in college and it's pretty easy to see why -- in addition to the shaky handle, he's a poor shooter with a flat shot. He actually airballed a two-foot finger roll in one game I saw. He can finish in transition, but in the half court his best bet at becoming somewhat useful offensively is to develop that midrange jumper. "
Yeah, I'd need to see a lot more than 12 attempts to convince me that he isn't a horrible shooter from three.
Good post...all this does is reinforce the point that IF you are committed to Iggy, Thad and EB at the 2, 3 and 4, any material improvement in 3-point production is going to have to come from the PG...which is why - like you - I am open to moving Speights to either 1) move up in the draft for Curry or 2) package Speights with a S&T'd Miller in a 3-way with Portland and Chicago to land Hinrich.