
In fact, the next three will count. They all count, technically, but when we're talking about national and even local recognition, the Sixers haven't beaten anyone noteworthy. Starting tonight, they'll get the chance to change that.
The Denver Nuggets represent an interesting challenge for the Sixers. They've enjoyed many of the same benefits in this early season: little turnover on their roster; young legs and depth. In the depth department, they're one of the few teams who compares to Philly, and may even surpass them.
The Nuggets have used their depth to run out-run a lot of teams. They play in the high altitude of Denver, they pump the pace up (96.6 possessions/48 minutes, fastest in the league) and more often than not, their opponents have wilted. Last night, they evened up their record on the road at 3-3 with a double-digit win over the Bucks, who played yesterday, so they could again press that advantage. Tonight, they're going up against a younger team, a team who didn't play yesterday, and a team who can throw their own depth around (and the Sixers' bench brigade doesn't consist of a 35-year-old Andre Miller, a 33-year-old Chris Andersen and a 31-year-old Al Harrington). If the Nuggets come in expecting to run the Sixers right out of the gym, they're going to be in for a rude awakening.
The Nuggets have a big advantage on the inside in Nene. The Sixers don't have anyone who can handle him, which means they're going to have to make a decision. They can allow Hawes or Brand to take him one-on-one down on the blocks, or they can double. I'd prefer the former, because Denver constantly has shooters on the floor. If they do decide to double, it has to be decisive and the entire team has to be extremely crisp in their rotations. The Nuggets haven't shot the three particularly well this season, but they've shot it well enough where giving them a dozen open looks from deep will beat you. I'd prefer doubling off Andre Miller, if given the choice, since he can't shoot the three.
Tonight will be a good chance to see just how far the Sixers have come in their pick-and-roll defense. Lawson and Nene will run it frequently, and if the Sixers' starters have problems with it, don't be surprised to see Thad get early minutes. They'll put him on Nene so he can blow up the P&R out high and they'll live with Thad's post defense on the big man if they try to go that route. Jrue can't be lazy on those screens, because Lawson will stop and shoot the three, he has to fight over them and the big has to show. More importantly, Jrue has to make Lawson actually use the screen, if he cheats early, Lawson will reject it and use his speed to cut the other way and get into the lane.
On the offensive end, I'd go to Jrue in the post on the very first play. Then I'd go to him in the post on the second, third and fourth plays until Karl is forced to switch Lawson onto Meeks, then I'd isolate Igoudala with Gallinari on him and attack that matchup (if it exists). Basically, the Nuggets have one perimeter defender in their starting lineup, Afflalo, the other two guys can be attacked, and they should be attacked. Make Karl go to Brewer (who had the best game of his career last night).
Off the bench, we know exactly what to expect out of Andre Miller. Don't bite on the pump fakes in the lane, keep your eyes open for the back door and lobs. Don't get lulled to sleep thinking he's old because he's got that sneaky athleticism he'll break out every fifth or sixth game to shock you. Al Harrington always seems to kill the Sixers, like a lot of stretch fours do. If you wind up in a big lineup with Harrington on the floor, Brand has to make him pay on the defensive end. Go to the blocks, work him over and if/when Denver doubles, hit the threes when he kicks it out.
Denver has run over people by constantly applying pressure on the offensive end. They push the ball up the floor, they run a brisk offense and they attack the rim. The Sixers run over teams because they apply 48 minutes of hellish defensive pressure. It's the classic immovable object vs. an unstoppable force and it should make for one hell of a game.
The tip is at 7pm. Game thread will land around 5.
Great preview as always Brian...but why the pic of Andy Samberg with this one??
Heh, I didn't even notice the resemblance. Obviously you're not a fan of my sophomoric Photoshop "skills."
Hopefully the one day's rest can make it a W.
Denver is a deep team in terms of talent, maybe not as hungry and focused as the Sixers are. But arguably with more talent. And on their day they can beat anyone. But at home and with a day's rest, and with the way the team's going so far, it should be a win for the Sixers.
hopefully Jrue can continue in that great vein of form he showed in the Milwaukee game.
We're all clearly thrilled by the way the Sixers have played thus far. But the .371 opponent's win percentage is currently the worst in the league. That said, the 11 easiest schedules thus far are Eastern Conference teams.
Even 1 out of the next 3 will give us a bit of credibility (and will give the team some confidence that they can beat some tough teams). If we get 2 out of 3, maybe our highlights will come before the :54 minute mark of every Sportscenter...
Great preview. I actually feel like this is the most difficult game out of the 3 we play the rest of the week (including Atlanta and Miami).
I have a feeling we're going to be seeing a lot of Tony Battie with Hawes injured.
I think the Timofey Mozgov matchup might be one that gives the Sixers problems. The best guy to take Mozgov is probably Thad. But if Thad switches up to take Nene, who's got Moz? Danillo has also played well of late. Hopefully our frontcourt can make up the diff.
peace yall
It'll be good to see how Vucevic can perform in this scenario.
Sixers are favored by 6 tonight. Vegas is accounting for the Nuggets being on the latter half of back to back road games, as well as the fact that the Sixers have been consistently covering the spread.
As mentioned, the frontcourt of the Nuggets will provide the biggest challenge for us. In addition to the interior scoring of Nene, he, Mozgov, and Birdman all average 1+ offensive rebounds per game. Gallinari and Lawson have been leading the Nuggets on the offensive end but the Sixers can match with their best 2 defenders at those positions.
I'm heading to the game so hopefully Vegas is right as usual and I get to see another W for the home squad.
I would expect Mosgov to have problems guarding Hawes up top but Nene may smother Elton's offensive output. I agree with your T.Young comment Brian, early and often with him tonight.
It should be an interesting night for Jrue defensively guarding two guys with totally different approaches.
If I remember correctly, Mozgov killed the Sixers on the offensive glass when he was with the Knicks. Keep an eye on that as well.
Let's hope that Hawes plays
Sixers -5.5 (bumped up to 6 in some locations). O/U 199.5. Sixers O/U 102.5. This is one of those games where I'm worried a slow start might be too difficult to come back from. Partridge if you're reading this, don't even think about rooting for the Nugs in this one.
Sixers and the under.
Taking the nuggets and the under, they have the front court advantage, they have bench depth that while might be older, possibly prevents the 'third quarter' explosion, they're the best team the sixers have played at home so far this year, and they had a pretty easy game last night so I don't expect them to be too tired.
And though not mentioned much in the write up, don't like that danilo match up at all
You don't like Iguodala guarding Danilo?
Not with the height differential and the type of game danilo plays...no, not particularly.
It's not lamar/pau/bynum, but there's a definite size mismatch going on against this roster, plus they just have a stronger front court that the sixers front court will have a problem defending, the rebounding frightens me
Yeah, I pretty much never go into a game worrying about what Iguodala's man is going to do.
I'm worried about when the Nuggets go w/ their two-point alignment and Collins counters w/ Lou/Jrue, putting Lou on Lawson. I want to see Collins go big in that situation and put Jrue on Lawson, Turner on Miller. Then punish them on the offensive end w/ their size advantage in the back court.
Assuming that turner and hawes even play, hopefully that yoga helped.
Honestly, I just hope the game is close, I expect them to lose
From what I saw this morning, looks like Turner is a go and Hawes is iffy.
Well thank god they want out and strengthened the bench depth after trading speights...oh wait, they didn't do that
Not even when he's matched up against Dirk?
Why would iguodala be matched up against dirk?
He's been matched up with Dirk before. I think vs. NYK, they had him guard Amare.
He's taken each of those guys for a couple of minutes in the past, but that's not his matchup going into the game.
I don't even really worry about LeBron or Durant killing the Sixers when we're playing them.
Agree. I just don't see how the Nuggets are going to put points on the board with Lawson and Gallinari covered by Jrue and Iguodala. I guess they could keep going to Nene, but although he is an efficient scorer, he is not a prolific one.
Question: do you guys get more frustrated when the sports talk radio guys don't talk about the Sixers or when they talk about them ignorantly?
Personally, I was happier (or at least less frustrated) when there wasn't much talk of the Sixers on sports talk. I did resent that the Eagles and even the Flyers got more attention. But now, it seems 90% of the discussion of the team is sophomoric and/or uninformed.
However, I do realize that it is a good thing that this city is talking about the team. The more talk the more people turn out or tune into the games, and that is good for the franchise.
Thoughts?
I very, very rarely listen to philly sports talk radio. I'd say in general, though, that the more they talk about the Sixers, the better, no matter how clueless they are. Unless they're just talking about how much the team sucks.
Well, there has been some of that for sure. I mainly listen on my ride back and forth to work, so I don't have a good grasp of all the discussions, but what I have heard has been somewhat skeptical. They tend to discount the defense and harp about how the team needs a shot maker for the end of games and in the playoffs. Iggy takes a lot of heat, which seems ridiculous with the numbers he's been putting up this year. I get the feeling they'd trade the Knicks for the Sixers without a blink of the eye. Just because they want a superstar.
I stopped listening to sports radio a while ago. I could care less nowadays.
I attempt to listen to philly sports radio, but I can't, LA sports radio I listen to at work online sometimes depending on the mood - they're nicer :)
The Iguodala thing (someone just junk punch misanelli already) is ridiculous - again - i still would like to see him traded to a town that appreciates him
I'd prefer to see this team get to the ECF this year, then get Howard this summer so Iguodala can stay and be appreciated here.
Well, I'd prefer that to but I don't think it's a realistic outcome without some help - the sixers can't beat a healthy heat OR healthy Bulls in a 7 game series as far as I'm concerned, and they'd have to beat ONE of them in the second round unless by some miracle it went
Sixers
Bulls
Heat
Magic/Hawks whatever
So they bulls and heat had to face each other in the second round...I believe the sixers can win the atlantic, I don't believe they can get the one seed
There's a lot of hoops left to be played, but I do believe both the Bulls and the Heat have enough holes offensively that the Sixers can beat them. And I also don't think it's exactly a good bet that either of those teams (or any team, really) is going to be healthy when the playoffs get here. Look at how many minutes Deng is playing, and Rose is already beaten up, along with Wade.
The sixers have holes offensively - and they have an old fart ho might not hold up come playoff time either
All the teams have holes - it seems that rightly or wrongly come playoff team stars get more calls - and the sixers ain't got one - could cost them - they don't get the questoinable calls - they don't get the phantom calls - and that's sadly part of the game
You're being very optimistic. They can win maybe 2 games at most if they're playing a healthy Bulls or Heat team. Heck, I'm not even sure that the Sixers can beat the Nuggets tonight or Orlando in a few days.
I'm on board w/ great defense, and to my eyes, two of their big minute players have made a dramatic improvement on that end of the floor.
The Sixers are a great story so far this year. At least they are getting some attention on the national scale. But I think it is merely lip service until they beat a division leading team in a close game.
I don't think that is fair, since they are beating teams by 20 points like a division leader should, and they beat Indiana and were never really challenged. The problem was that their first big matchup (media-wise) was in New York and they lost a close game. Doesn't matter that it was the third game in three nights.
If they beat Denver by 2 points tonight, and they do it in dramtatic fashion...then the national spotlight will be on!
I'd prefer a 20-point win tonight, but to be honest with you, even if they go 3-0 this week, there will be people who still discount it.
W vs. Denver - Well, Denver was on the second night of a back-to-back
W vs ATL - Well, the Hawks didn't have Horford
W @ MIA - Well, the Heat didn't have Wade (or Wade wasn't 100%)
Honestly, the Sixers could win their next 7 games by a combined 100 points and people who don't want to believe, still wouldn't believe.
If I didn't know better I'd say you were drinking some kool-aid (and spencers slow descent back to earth isn't dissuading you huh?)
Honestly - if they DONT go 0-3 in the next 3 games I'll be thrilled - we'll see what happens
I didn't say they'd go 3-0, just said that even if they did, people would say it doesn't count.
Sorry, wasn't implying that you did, just saying I'm probably one of those 'hasn't bought in yet' folks - that's all - I really think 1-2 is the most likely outcome of the next 3 - the heats outburst last night made me think that even if wade is unavailable it won't matter
Teams have to be really disciplined to beat the Sixers, or just get insanely hot on long twos, because they do a superb job of taking away the high percentage shots. A disciplined team will reverse the ball a couple of times, and eventually get a decent look. But impetuous teams are going to take that "good look" from 22 feet all night and wonder why they wound up shooting 42% from the floor.
Um - ok - sure - or you could have a talented (half talented) big man and feed him relentlessly cause the sixers can't even stop javale mcgee from getting good looks
Boozer and Bosh? yeah, I'm not really worried about either of them beating us on the blocks.
YOu'll pardon me if i'm not so blase about it after watching the immature javale mcgee get whatever he wanted (didn't make em all for sure) just a couple days ago
Well, Denver's just not that great, and it's a home game. Atlanta's a pretty mediocre team without Horford. I think Miami, even w/o Wade, would be a big win though.
Kevin Love 4 years 60 million supposed is going to be minnesotas offer - that doesn't sound 'maxy' to me - is it?
Hmmn. I'm not sure what a max extension is. Rudy Gay waited until the summer after his fourth season and signed what, 6/$85M?
Love might get the escalators if he waits, as well, which I believe was $94M for Rose.
In completely unrelated news - how I love the rumors regarding the thunder not being able to keep their core together even though they have the 'restricted' rights to all of them :)
ESPN Daily 5 on 5 looks at four teams as 'contenders' or 'pretenders' - one in the east - none of them the sixers
http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/page/5-on-5-120118/nba-contenders-pretenders?eleven=twelve
Why would the Hawks be in there instead of the Sixers? Ugh.
Because we're just so obviously a contender that it's not worth debating : )
Hmmn, hadn't considered that. You're probably right.
Actually I think it's that they're positive we're a pretender and don't think it's worth debating.
I reject your negativity. The Clips sure put up a good fight last night sans CP3. If they hadn't made that trade, they would've finished this season below .500.
They did talk about the sixers in the previous 5 on 5 as a surprise team AND least likely to maintain it (though not everyone felt iwas the sixers)
Hard to tell. In any case, now they have the best point guard in the league and they're a marginal contender.
Of course, the real reason the Hawks and Blazers, Mavs and Clippers were in that 5-on-5 is that they're all on ESPN tonight.
Oh and keep in mind that before the trade they would have had Eric Gordon.
Would they? That guy misses so many games.
True. Anyway, we solved the mystery of the 5-on-5.
Someone please look at this.
Change the sort from per game to totals, and look at Turner's conversion rate at the rim.
96%?
25/26.
I almost think that has to be a mistake. Unreal. 26 attempts isn't bad for the number of minutes he's played, either. Iguodala has 34 attempts, Jrue has 39.
Check out synergy but it seems right to me - he's really good when he gets near the rim :)
Yeah actually i've seen this stat before but didn't want to overreact because i think it's still a small sample size even though 26 attempts is not that little...