
For the second time in five days, the Sixers will take on the Indiana Pacers on the second night of a back-to-back. This time, the odds are stacked even more in the Indiana's favor. The Sixers are coming off a backbreaking overtime loss to the Wizards. Their only interior player of any note, Elton Brand, played 42 hard minutes last night. Meanwhile, Danny Granger put into practice a skill he perfected while playing for Team USA this summer...he sat around and did nothing.
For the first time in his brief career on the bench for the Sixers, Doug Collins will see a team for the second time. It's time for him to earn his money. He saw what the Sixers were able to do against Indy on Saturday, he saw what didn't work. What adjustments will he make tonight? More importantly, how is he going to juggle his frontcourt rotation while dealing with Elton Brand, who has to be running on fumes at this point?
Here's a quick look at the minute breakdown from last night's game:
- Elton Brand, PF 42
- Jrue Holiday, PG 41
- Andre Iguodala, SG 38
- Lou Williams, PG 32
- Evan Turner, SG 28
- Thaddeus Young, F 18
- Marreese Speights, C 17
- Andres Nocioni, F 16
- Spencer Hawes, C 16
- Tony Battie, C 9
- Jason Kapono, SF 7
The only guy we really need to worry about is Brand. Jrue should be able to play 80 minutes in one game. Unfortunately, without Elton Brand on the floor, this team is helpless with a capital H. The Pacers have been dormant since beating the Sixers on Saturday, so Jim O'Brien has had plenty of time to figure out that no one on Philly's roster has a prayer against Roy Hibbert. Wondering how many touches he'll get tonight.
Forgetting the x's and o's for a second, let's go ahead and talk about things like guts, toughness, veteranness, killer instinct, what have you. No, I don't want to talk about how Andres Nocioni is just so much more valuable than his numbers indicate simply because he's so damned savvy. I want to talk about players and a team having the ability to forget they're tired and put 48 minutes of effort on the floor under tough circumstances.
I'm pretty sure the Sixers are going to lose tonight. If the script holds, they'll come out fine, maybe lead or trail at the half, then they'll get run out of the gym in the third quarter before starting some semblance of a comeback which will ultimately fall short. This isn't about their trend as a team in general, it's about what happens when teams play tired. If they're going to be able to get their first win, they're going to need to avoid that lull after the break. When their legs feel heavy, they're going to have to fight through it. They can't let themselves be a step slower after the break, they can't get lazy in chasing down boards. They can't jog back on defense. If they dig a hole for themselves with lackadaisical play, they probably aren't going to have the energy to dig themselves out.
So a tired team off to an 0-4 start, playing in an empty home arena after a tough loss to a terrible team last night. Yeah, I'd say a solid effort would say something about the character of this team. More of the same, well, that would probably carry the opposite message, wouldn't it?
The tip is at 7pm. Game thread will be up at 5:30pm. Thoughts and predictions in the comments.
Prediction - Indiana 104, Philadelphia 89
Is anyone having FireFox Isues (Mac OS X) online, it's becoming non responsive on a bunch of pages (not just this one)
I think the Sixers will lose, but will give another good effort night. I read an article by Kate Fagan and the comments were mostly about "how it's time to trade Iggy". Why would we trade the best player on the team to develop the young players when the young players are not good enough to start? It seems like a lot of Sixer "Fans" just want to trade players on a whim. Didn't they learn from the Dalembert trade? The only players IMO that should be traded ASAP are Hawes, Speights, and Kopono.
It's kind of funny, the majority of the people who want Iguodala traded, want him moved because they think he's the reason the team is so bad. They think trading him is somehow going to make the team better. There is an argument to be made for trading, but it's that it will make the team worse in the short term (meaning a better chance at winning the draft lottery), and hopefully free up some cap space (assuming we don't make any more Nocioni-type deals).
Oh and if you ask those same morons what they think about the Dalembert trade now, they'll still say it was addition by subtraction.
Such is the curse of the Sixers fan.
There are really people who think Dalembert was addition by subtraction? How do they explain this season?
They blame it all on Iguodala.
There are really people who think Dalembert was addition by subtraction? How do they explain this season?
Dalembert was a clubhouse cancer
That's the explanation
I asked, what's the explanation for how we're a lot worse now that we've made this "addition"? I mean, Dalembert had some flaws, you don't have to be completely insane to think that losing him would help us, but this season, even though it's just four games old, has pretty well proved an addition by subtraction theory wrong.
I'm hoping we can get more than just cap room for Iguodala, because I honestly think cap room is worthless for us, what free agent ever wants to come to Philly? Certainly not one of Iguodala's caliber. The only one was Brand and that's because he wanted to play in the northeast and nobody else had cap room. His experience has probably ensured no one will ever make the same mistake and come here. And it's also the reason I still think Brand's contract is fine, because there's no way we can get a player who averages 15 and 9 to come here as a free agent, so Brand's cap space doesn't clog anything.
But I do think we can get a good young player for him or a fairly high 2011 draft pick. Perhaps Greg Oden with a couple bums to match the salaries? I'm thinking perhaps Portland is sick of him getting hurt all the time.
to clarify I'm saying Iguodala for Oden, not Brand for Oden.
http://sports.espn.go.com/boston/nba/news/story?id=5759196
I guess now that KG has diminished skills, he needs to dig deeper to keep his "mental edge" over opponents
SUch a punk ass bitch, he always has been.
Even worse is his excuse:
http://www.bostonherald.com/blogs/sports/celtics/index.php/2010/11/03/garnett-statement/
Insulting.
Does he expect anyone to believe that, in the midst of jabbering on the court, he drops a "you are cancerous to your team and this league"? Nobody talks like that. Garnett surely doesn't talk like that. His agent made up that line.
Moreover, doesn't he realize that this new insult he claims he said is still offensive to people with cancer?
there's a reason it took him 4 times to get a passing score on the ACT...
Oh come on, he only took it 3 times...
And not for nothing, but it's also a cheap shot to people with alopecia. Villanueva has a condition and Garnett thinks he should make fun of it and cancer all at once.
And that some how is just 'talking trash'
Always knew he was a little bitch, but everyone forgets it cause he 'wins' - so when he's barking like a little poodle on the sideline he's just encouraging.
He's a bitch pure and simple
I'm generally unimpressed with Collins, but it's only 4 games. I didn't like the hire from the start because it seemed like Stefanski had once again picked his guy out before the interviews (like Eddie J) and because every teams Collins coached improved after he left. But I will give him credit for one thing. He's the first coach to realize Darius Songaila does not belong in the NBA. Finally!