I'm operating on the assumption that the question is when will Eddie Jordan be fired, rather than will he be fired. There's simply nothing else to keep me sane as I watch this team flounder. So taking his departure as a given, a few big questions must be answered almost immediately. I'll take a shot after the jump.
Before we dive in, a big announcement. The goat braces picture atop this post will officially be retired until I can happily report Eddie Jordan has been canned.
Now that we have that out of the way, the big questions and bigger decisions.
The Interim Coach
Interim being the operative word. The Sixers need someone who will first and foremost be a company man. He's going to get marching orders from the front office and he's going to follow them to the letter (we'll get to them in a moment). I think a younger guy fits better than a retread, and he's going to have to be a guy who can connect with these players. As far as strategy goes, think defense first. Factoring in the almighty dollar and I think it's a pretty short list. Forget Ayers, Ford and Lynam, the guy pictured below is my guy and I really don't have to think too long about this decision.

Uh, the guy on the right, Aaron McKie. Not Mo Cheeks. I thought about Tony DiLeo, but he's going to have a much bigger role in a much more important aspect of the team's development.
On-the-court Direction
This is actually pretty simple, there are right now five guys, possibly six who
could still be here when meaningful basketball is being played in the playoffs at the Wach.: Andre Iguodala, Jrue Holiday, Thad Young, Marreese Speights, Lou Williams, Elton Brand. Maybe Brand doesn't belong on this list, you can make the argument, but you absolutely cannot prove it. Not based on the work he's done over the first 29 games of this season, not with this coach, this system, playing out of position for almost half of his minutes and being benched for most of the season. In fact, figuring out what exactly Elton Brand brings to the table is going to be one of the prime objectives going forward, and also it's going to be a role I'm going to involve Tony DiLeo in extensively.
So those are your six key players. From day one of the McKie era, they're all getting starter's minutes, at their natural positions, per game. This isn't brain surgery:
- Jrue at the point - 30 minutes minimum
- Iguodala at the two - 30 minutes minimum with rare minutes at the three
- Thad at the three - 30 minutes minimum with rare minutes at the four
- Brand at the four - 30 minutes minimum with rare minutes at the five
- Speights at the four/five - 30 minutes minimum split evenly between the two positions
- Lou at the one/two - 30 minutes minimum, mostly at the two, with some PG minutes sprinkled in.
That's 180 minimum of the possible 240 minutes taken up by those six players. The starting lineup is Jrue, Iguodala, Thad, Brand, Dalembert. No exceptions.
I'd like about half of those remaining 60 minutes to go to Sam Dalembert for two reasons. First, this team is going to defend and, like it or not, Dalembert is the best defensive center we have. I don't want to see guys play solid perimeter defense only to get no help from the weak side. Second, Dalembert's trade value has to be factored into any decision. If he's rotting on our bench, his value goes from little to none.
The other 30 minutes don't mean a whole lot to me. Mix and match between any of these guys depending on foul trouble/situation. None of these players matter in the grand scheme of things, as far as I'm concerned they can all be released/replaced at the drop of a hat. They won't be here when Philadelphia is no longer the laughing stock of the league: Kapono, Ivey, Green, Jason Smith, Brezec, Rodney Carney and Allen Iverson (more on him later).
If McKie plays any one of these players for more than 20 minutes in a game, there better be a damned good reason.
As far as the systems go on either side of the ball, two words will replace harmony and effort. Simplicity and intensity. The offense will focus on four things: (1) Running at every opportunity; (2) Pick and rolls utilizing both Brand and Speights' ability to hit 15-foot jumpers; (3) Isolations (like it or not, the Sixers have athletes who can get to the rim in one-on-one situations, we aren't going to live and die by these, but we also won't completely ignore them); (4) Mismatches. When one presents itself, which happens more frequently than you'd think, we're going to exploit it until the other team is forced to react.
On the defensive end we're going to be a man-to-man team that's going to hold each player accountable. There will be no helping from anyone on the floor but the shotblockers. There will be accountability off-the-ball and on-the-ball. We will spend hours upon hours upon hours in the gym working on pick-and-roll defense and the coach will dictate how we handle the play depending on the personnel on the floor for the other team. Switching only when absolutely necessary, trapping when we see a weakness we can exploit, hedging hard most of the time. This team will play fundamental, hard-nosed defense and every player on the floor will be held accountable for his performance. If you don't defend, you don't play. Simple as that. If Lou Williams, Marreese Speights or Thad Young truly cannot or will not defend, this is something we must know as soon as possible, because if that's the case, then they become expendable. If they can be coached to defend, then they truly are building blocks.
When I sit McKie down and tell him the terms of his employment the first thing I say to him is that wins and losses do not matter. Two things matter: Roster development and roster evaluation. He's got his marching orders, he's going to dole out minutes as we (the front office) see fit, he's going to institute the systems we want and we don't want to see him straying from these guidelines to "steal" wins. His job is to get the guys in that locker room to buy in, 100%, have them ready to play and then execute the game plan. Period. Is it an ideal situation for a guy with aspirations of being a head coach some day? Probably not, but it is that ever-elusive foot in the door and if he performs well (by our standards, not wins and losses) there is the possibility that he can remove the interim title next season.
Off-the-court DirectionFirst of all, Tony DiLeo is sitting in on every practice, in the arena for every game and on the road for every trip. I want his eyes on this roster and I want to know exactly which pieces he believes are worth keeping. Right now, he's the only basketball mind in the organization I trust, and if all goes as planned, he's going to be the one making what could be a crucial decision in the draft this summer so I need to have an accurate assessment of what we need, and who we can afford to move if we need to acquire a piece and/or move up in the draft.
Second, Allen Iverson's time with this team is over. I'm going to sit down with him, explain the situation to him and give him two choices. He can either retire now (voluntarily, or we void the remainder of his contract), or he can play along with the "arthritis" thing until the end of the season, then make a miraculous recovery for the final game of the season, which incidentally becomes "Allen Iverson Night." One final good bye, he suits up for the Sixers one last time, we retire his jersey and squeeze one final sell out from this disastrous situation.
The next move is to make 29 phone calls to every other GM in the league to gauge the level of interest in every player on our roster. I'm not ready to make trades just yet unless the player their asking for is outside of that core group of six, but I need to know exactly who wants which player, how close we could be to making a deal, and which of our core players could be moved if we get to that point, and for how much. For the moment, I'll trade anyone outside of the core six for nothing more than cap relief. But if I'm going to move any of the six, it has to be to move the franchise forward in more than a financial sense, down the road. For example, if someone makes an offer for Iguodala, I'm not even going to be listening unless I get a high lottery pick, cap relief and a serviceable player in return. The overriding philosophy here is that no one from the core is moved during this period of development/evaluation unless our doors are completely blown off by an offer. I'm not making long-term decisions on this roster based on the games played under Jordan. The only possible exception to this rule is Brand. If someone offers me pure cap relief for him, I have to consider it. There's a very good chance that he isn't washed up, but if I have a chance to truly hit the reset button on that contract I have to take it considering the age of the other five players in the core.
The evaluation/development period is about more than simply evaluating what we have on the roster. It's also about evaluating what we need. Not just in the draft, but also from other teams around the league. I'd love to be able to come up with a short list of guys who can really fit our talent and then work from that angle to make a deal, rather than constantly searching for another team who will take a problem off our hands. Marcin Gortat strikes me as a perfect fit at the five next to either Brand or Speights at the four. I'm going to start probing Orlando to see if we have any pieces they'd be interested in. I'm sure there are other players around the league who'd fit our unique roster better than they fit their current one, I want to start identifying those guys now.
What do I expect to get out of all of this? First, I don't expect to make the playoffs this season. Would I be heartbroken if we did? Absolutely not. If we followed this plan and it landed us in the playoffs then we should have some pretty solid pieces in our core and we should also be in a position to augment that core with three expiring contracts next season in Kapono, Dalembert and Green. To be honest, though, I think we still wind up with a top-ten pick. We're talking about splitting time at the point between a 19-year-old rookie and Lou Williams on a nightly basis. There are going to be growing pains. I also think this approach would expose any one or two of Lou/Speights/Thad, if not all three, as severe defensive liabilities, which would lead to more losses. Of course, making any of those guys expendable would also open more doors for trades. You may not be able to get fair value for Dalembert alone, but package Dalembert with Speights or Thad and you're at least going to get your call returned.
Above all, I'm going to be able to update this assessment of the core as it stands right now, and make informed decisions if we do in fact need to tear it down:
- Jrue Holiday - Absolute keeper. In this league, a point who can defend on-the-ball is extremely valuable. His instincts with the ball and passing ability make him a definite starter on a contending team, if his jumper comes along, he could be a cornerstone.
- Andre Iguodala - Not a primary scorer, but can be the best all-around player on a contending team. Needs scorers on the floor with him. Can and does lock down the best perimeter scorer on the other team on a nightly basis.
- Thad Young - Efficient scoring, developing three-point shot, not much else.
- Marreese Speights - Explosive scoring, a liability in all other areas
- Lou Williams - Points off the bench, probably gives up more than he scores though.
- Elton Brand - Toughness, interior scoring. Maybe not dominant on the blocks anymore, money from 15 feet in. Good-to-great shotblocker, good-to-great offensive rebounder, decent defensive rebounder.
To me, at this point, Jrue and Iguodala probably need either Thad or Speights on the floor with them to carry the offense, and their defense can help make up for the defensive weakness of one of them. It's a stretch to hide two guys on the defensive end. If you put a gun to my head, I'd say either Speights or Thad is expendable. But I don't think that's necessarily an informed opinion, that's why we need this period of development and evaluation.
So there you have it. My post-Jordan plan for the Sixers. The looming question if they do fire Jordan is what they hope to accomplish with the move. If they plan to bring a miracle-worker in to salvage this season, it's not going to work. Making wins and losses the primary goal defeats the purpose if the new guy is simply going to lean on scrubs like Willie Green to boost his own numbers. The right players need to be on the floor, in the right positions to make in-depth evaluations. That's the only thing that matters.
In other news, Sixers @ Blazers late tonight. I'll be here with bells on to watch Andre Miller abuse Lou Williams and hear how Brandon Roy is the second coming. Preview late this afternoon.
goood post brian. i agree with pretty much everything you had to say on here. i think if we're going to trade anyone in that core it should be thad because i feel like iguodala should be playing the 3. i see speights as our future 4, jrue our point and andre our 3, lou off the bench and draft picks to fill in the other holes, at least the shooting guard spot. i think if we find any way to trade up and get john wall this year that would be a perfect scenario and then somehow get someone who can play the 5 at a high level.
Excellent post Brain. Its articles like these that keep me returning to your blog. I wasnt on board with the Jordan hiring...but I had no idea it would turn out this bad. At first I blamed it on the players...but Brand has turned out to be a slightly above average PF for this team and Jrue can indeed play. Its not the players...its the coach and it is so obvious(as it has been for over a month now if not more) that the team does not respect or respond to Jordan. Lets have a little gambling shall we....lets say the over under is 12 wins. Do you think Jordan will be fired before the sixers win 12 games or after ? I am taking the under because I dont see there 12th win until at least February. What do you guys think ? Over or under 12 ?
12 wins could be March or later at this rate.
Right now, we have to completely rethink what is a winnable game. Only 4 teams are even approaching the horrendous level the Sixers are playing at. They're below average on offense and absolutely pitiful on defense.
New Jersey
Minnesota
Golden State
Indiana
Those are the four teams against whom you could consider games that we should win. They have five games against those teams between now and the end of February.
I don't expect them to continue being this bad, but right now those are the only games on the schedule you can look at and say, "They should win those games."
It's very, very sad. I don't think Jordan's here to break double digits in wins, personally.
This is very close to the strategy most of us wanted when Cheeks was fired, so I guess its take two...
Good summation of what the team needs to do now that it is hitting bottom. You did not use the word "tank", but honestly not prioritizing winning is not that far from it. I would give the coach a little more leeway than you suggest- but I agree there needs to be priorities. I would not run Thad 80% at PF just to try and win more games. And I would not bench Jrue for making mistakes.
In terms of moves, Id guess someone would be willing to give us value for Thad, so he might be worth trading. I would also strongly try to move Brand, but not expect to be able to on out terms (no bad contracts back.)
Define "bad contracts." Brand has 3 years, $51.2M left on his contract after this season. So would you take back someone with equal money/years remaining, but possibly a better fit? A year less? There are degrees of bad contracts.
Monta Ellis - 4 years, $44M
Corey Maggette - 3 years, $30.8M
Rip Hamilton - 3 years, $37.5M
Gerald Wallace - 3 years, $28.5M
Baron Davis - 3 years, $41.2M
Emeka Okafor - 4 years, $52.6M
Eddy Curry - 1 years, $11.4M
Antawn Jamison - 2 years, $28.4M
Gilbert Arenas - 4 years, $80.2M
Would you take any of those contracts in return for Brand?
I don't get rid of any of the core players (and I include both Brand and Iguodala in the core) until we have a HC with a freaking clue leading this team.
I think this roster can win games if we had somebody like JVG or Collins coaching them...and if DiLeo can come up with one more rabbit out of his hat this summer (preferably either a fill-it-up SG or a defensive big), this team can be RIDICULOUSLY better...if we can just get rid of Dumb and Dumber Part 2 ASAP.
Monta Ellis - 4 years, $44M- Yes
Corey Maggette - 3 years, $30.8M- If they threw in Randolph ;)
Rip Hamilton - 3 years, $37.5M- lateral move, but yes
Gerald Wallace - 3 years, $28.5M- poor fit, but yes
Baron Davis - 3 years, $41.2M- NO
Emeka Okafor - 4 years, $52.6M- NO
Eddy Curry - 1 years, $11.4M- Yes
Antawn Jamison - 2 years, $28.4M -Yes
Gilbert Arenas - 4 years, $80.2M- No
Corey Maggette - 3 years, $30.8M- If they threw in Randolph ;)
It would have to be bigger than that to make the salaries work. Maggette, Claxton and Randolph for Brand straight up :)
How would you feel about this:
Brand and Thad for Maggette, Randolph, Morrow and Claxton?
We would be giving up two of out best, most talented players for a no-D gunner (Maggette), a contract (Claxton), a young guy with potential (Morrow) and a guy (Randolph) that I think Thad has the potential to eventually surpass (with a coach who has a clue).
Let's get the clowns out of here first before we do a trade like this.
Brian, from the previous blog.
Just wondering. Wasn't Dileo brought in to evaluate the personnel on the roster? Based upon that analysis EJ is hired to put his system in with this personnel? Where was the disconnect there?
Edward Stefanski
That's your disconnect
That's who needs to go when Jordan goes or the team is still screwed.
In Brians analysis he seemed to ignore that DiLeo doesn't get to make roster moves...I'm not sure why, but Stefanski is the man in charge.
I kind of wrote from the perspective that I was Stefanski, what would I do in his position.
If they're going to clean house and fire both Eds I'm not sure how much of the plan I'd change. DiLeo would just become the GM. In the scenario I laid out above, DiLeo's going to be the guy evaluating the entire roster and basically laying out what we have and what we need.
Brian:
I read your post from the perspective of BOTH clowns (aka: Dumb and Dumber Part 2) being gone. I do not see a scenario where Jordan is canned and Stefanski is still here. If I was Brian/Ralphie/Snider/Luukko, they have to be a package dismissal.
If any of those four have been paying attention at all to this franchise, they have to know that DiLeo is the only guy who has added reasonably consistent value to the franchise over the past several years...and he can probably handle being an interim GM at least until the summer. McKie I am not so sure about. I would rather have him than the other assistants, but at least in a peripheral way, he is still a part of this mess.
I think we need a new voice. If we cannot get a guy like JVG until the summer, I would rather bring a guy in for a 50 game test-drive (my choice is Eric Snow)...see if he can handle the job...see if he would want to be a HC...at the very least, he would bring what he learned as a PG with LB and a defacto assistant with Mike Brown in CLE...focust on a defensive mind-set and consistent execution on offense.
Here's hoping for a winless WC trip.
Two problems with bringing Snow in, first he isn't already on the pay roll. Second, he doesn't really have experience. When we're comparing Snow to McKie, I think I like Mckie's resume better. Playing under Brown and Phil Jackson carries more weight for me than playing under Larry and Mike Brown, plus he's the assistant that works with Jrue and Iguodala before games. He's the guy most likely to get and keep their ears in what would probably be a tough transition.
I would be OK with McKie...I just worry that getting rid of EJ and O'Koren from this staff might not be enough. I also prefer Snow's mindset and approach to the game to McKie's...not that McKie can't coach defense per se, but Snow brings the mentality of a football player to defense...didn't Kobe call Snow his toughest cover back in the day?
THAT is the kind of defensive intensity that I want to bring to the table...an in-your-jock, physical, withering approach. While McKie was certainly a good defender, Snow - at his best - was a LOAD.
This team also has a lot of young guys who need help with structure and execution on offense, and I like Snow's pedigree (as an LB-schooled PG) better than McKie's.
While McKie may have more coaching "experience" than Snow (i.e. he has worn a suit on the sidelines longer), that does not make him a better HC prospect than Snow in my eyes. Frankly, I don't even know if Snow would be interested...but when it comes to things like defensive intensity and on-the-court smarts, I think that Snow would fit the bill more than McKie would.
Having said all that, I would be jumping for joy if the Ed's were replaced by DiLeo and McKie.
Great players do not always make great coaches.
I find the constant calls for Snow to be HC with absolutely no NBA coaching experience odd...if he wanted to coach why isn't he on a bench somewhere being an assistant (same gods for Mark Jackson)
Being a player doesn't make you a coach
Precisely why Ford makes much more sense & IMHO is the best "low-cost" option we have for someone likely to baby-sit the rest of the season anyway. Plus his old position gives the organization a place to put EJ to ride out the remainder of his contract!
I want EJ as far away from this franchise as possible. Do you really see Ford getting through to these young players?
Given how they responded to Mo/DiLeo, it's obvious these players can be reached/productive so in my mind, it's just another excuse from EJ! Now, while it may be true they are having trouble grasping the PO, I don't think they lack a basic/fundamental knowledge of the game. So would it be too much to think that maybe they've been questioning his game-planning/substitutions/lack of a consistent offense/defensive scheme right along with us? Couple this with an unwarranted ego & his idiot head-games & I think we're beginning to grasp the potential problem here! So...yes...if like Mo/DiLeo...Ford can reach these players with straight talk (without using the press), preaching/maintaining/inpiring confidence in them & his offensive/defensive schemes...he'll do just fine!
Was he brought in to evaluate? If he was, he certainly didn't coach like it. I seemed to me like he was brought in to get the most out of the roster that he'd pretty much built, and get them to the playoffs. Mainly because they spent a ton of money the previous summer and they weren't simply going to tank away the season after a bad start. That's what moving Thad to the four, Iguodala to the three etc. said to me.
Brand going down didn't help, obviously, but I didn't really see any kind of effort to evaluate guys at their natural position. I'm fine with that, he kept the team moving on the upward arc, but in hind sight, I don't think it's fair to say he was brought in to evaluate when winning games seemed to be his primary goal.
Valid point. He was coaching to win.
I know for a fact the Stefanski's son, reads this blog. I would bet the Big Ed reads it as well. This is the best idea that has been posted in a long time. If I am going to continue to watch this team, this is the strategy I want implemented. Isn't it clear that we are the last real fans? Iverson, "all you can eat nights", and all the other marketing shenanigans have gotten us no where. We need a strategy the core can get behind. I want to see so much Jrue for the rest of the year, that i really know what we have in him. I want to see Thad get abused by every 3 in the league so we know what we have. I want to see everything Brian just listed and i want to see them now. Or i am out. And if i am out, can you imagine how the average fan feels? Actually, you don't need to imagine. Look at the attendance figures.
CSTH
Problem is, at least in my opinion, BOTH ed's need to go.
I certainly can't muster much of an argument against this thinking, but for some reason I think I'd give him a do-over on the coach thing if he's willing to hit the eject button now.
You hit the nail on the head. The average fan is already gone. So you have a unique opportunity here, you can actually make smart basketball decisions to build for the long term without worrying about alienating anyone. Compounding the mistakes you've already made with more of the same is going to slowly drive even the diehards away.
"Unique opportunity"... that is funny. You should consider marketing.
I'm reading "The Art of a Beautiful Game" right now and about halfway through there's a section on the Hoops Whisperer. Eddie Jordan is quoted in the chapter a couple times, I thought this one would make you guys laugh:
"It's crucial that the players know that you respect them." :)
He also talks about how the trainer gave him valuable insight into how to deal with Brendan Haywood, he finished that bit with this quote, "...by the end we had a great relationship." Which is kind of funny considering Haywood's quotes about Jordan since, and also Haywood's production now that he isn't stuck playing for Jordan.
Overall, the book is a good read, but oddly, I don't think it has as many insights as Simmons' book, believe it or not.
These are little things but I would like a steady rotation 6 through 10 with nobody getting 40 m.p.g.. Watching M.Bonner develop after a few years in the league makes me think J.Smith can have a similar role as a stretch 4 for a good team and Carney also could have a B.Bowen type role, and most importantly, give Iggy a break.Guys, do you think E.S. can possibly believe that Jordan!s first year in Wash. is just being repeated and would let him continue no matter what the record because he expects a turnaround? And did Jordan have an effect on who Wash. picked because N. Young seemed like a player he would like but McGee doesn!t, although he could of picked him to replace Haywood, who he disliked.
There's no reason to push anyone to 40 minutes per game, agree with that. I have zero faith that Smith and Carney are going to develop into solid role players, though. Maybe the right coach can get each to concentrate on one marketable skill, but right now they just don't have any focus. Carney's an athlete, but he's not a lockdown defender. Smith is in love w/ his jumper, but he doesn't rebound and he's completely unfocused on the floor. I just don't see it out of either of them.
I also think, if Marreese is part of this team!s future as a starter, a complimentary 4 or 5 has to be brought in yesterday.Guys like J. Hill,Thabeet,J.Mc Gee and similar types in this draft have to be looked at.Spieghts has been compared to Amare and Pheonix never put that guy next to him, though R.Lopez was brought in to fill that role. If Thad and Marreese are our future 3/4 combo than the sooner we address this the better.
Check out the post TK76 had above about Maggette. Anthony Randolph might be a really good fit next to Speights, his rebounding and shot blocking numbers are actually quite good.
Jrue
Maggette/Morrow
Iguodala
Randolph
Speights
I might roll with that.
I need to learn more about Randolph, beyond his feakish build. Looking at his numbers I'm impressed by his defensive rebounding % (22.3 for career) but how skewed is that in GS funky offense?
It comes down to whether you can start a Speights/Randolph front court. And right now I'd say no.
Defensive rebounding % shouldn't really be skewed by the pace of the game. Playing with a bunch of bad rebounders could skew it though.
Might? F that. That would be pretty much perfect.
If you should get rid of that awful Brand contract for Morrow and Randolph you do that at the drop of a hat. Without question.
Depending on what you think of Stephen A. Smith and his credibility, I heard him talking about the Sixers around the time he broke the AI story. He mentioned that Ed Snider actually preferred Josh Smith AND Jamison over Elton. Stefanski had to insist that they spend the extra money to acquire Elton...
Makes me wonder how safe Stefanski will be after this season. Whether you like Elton or not, he is not the franchise changer he was signed to be(even playing 40 min a night), and right now he and EJ are both making Stefanski look foolish.
He went on to say that the organization would trade Iguodala for "a bag of donuts" at this point, not sure if I buy that but hey who knows...
Jamison signed really early with Washington and Josh Smith was never really a viable option, so if Snider had a hard on for those guys, he's as clueless as we think he is.
Stefanski's job security can't be great, though. I'm amazed by how quiet he's been through all of this.
I'm sure we'll hear from him at some point after the completion of the road trip. He will probably end up on Comcast Sportsnet, they'll ask him a bunch of softball questions because the network owns the team. He will say virtually nothing except "we need to get better top to bottom blah blah", and our intelligence will continue to be insulted. They are doing a really great job of alienating the handful of fans they actually have.
If it is Jamison or Elton, I!ll take Elton for THIS team. Another score that doesn!t defend is not what we need here.
Well, Jamisons contract seems more movable to me, I'll take that over EB's "Philly Max" contract any day. Neither player fits what the Sixers are doing here, Josh Smith would have been perfect but he really wasn't an option
If Elton continues his solid play and teams run out of options who built up cap space this summer, players stay put, Elton may gain a lot of value back. Let!s hope so.
I might just be pessimistic, but I don't think anyone is going to take on Elton's contract, it's not worth the risk. He has durability issues and I think there are major questions around the league about whether or not he can be the player that he once was.
Watching B.Wallaces effect on a young Pistons team makes me not mind Elton being here.With a bunch of soft young players here, and one more coming in this draft, Elton SHOULD have a good influence on these kids.If TK76!s scenerio with A.Randolph happened who better to toughen up him and Marreese than a guy like Elton.
If Snider wants Elton to earn his Philly max make him a player-coach for the rest of the year, we sure wouldn!t have guys out there not rebounding and defending, in fact I may go buy a ticket to watch that !!!
That's were I stand also.
Brian excellent post. Once the season is finished, who do you think the Sixers will hire as there new head coach
Good post. One thing though. If you really do want to play man-to-man AND build a defense competent roster, Lou Williams is not on it. I forget who posted it, but apparently every player the Sixers brought in off the street would abuse Williams in the summer. Also, before kicking Iverson to the curb, I'd give him the ultimatum of either coming off the bench or retiring. Yes, I know he's refused to do this in the past, but he's been much more of a facilitator than a scorer this year, and he would be a very very good backup PG.
If that's how things shake out (with Lou), then I'm fine with that. I'd like a coach to say to him, "Listen Lou, if you don't defend, you aren't playing," just to see how he reacts. If that doesn't change anything, then you move him to the expendable side of the ledger.
Great post, Brian. My only difference is I like Carney and would like to see him get some consistent minutes. Concerning demanding defense from Lou, I'd make the exact same demand of everyone, not just Lou. If you don't defend, you don't play. I think this roster has the athletes to be a top 10 defensive team.
Wow sick plan, couldn't agree more. Great to see the true fans prefer Jrue over Lou. Half of all Sixer fans I talk to have this insane hard on for Lou.
Even though this move has no future impact here I just couldn't bare seeing Iverson play less than 20 minutes as a Sixer. That would really make me cringe. I wouldn't mind seeing him get 25 or so minutes a game. Lou is really not any better than him at this point.
Watching a show on N.B.A. tv about some young players in the league. Interesting how J. Foster is becoming a mentor to R.Hibbert and Hibbert seems to be trying to absorb all his wisdom. Marreese, take the hint?
It seems like Mareese is too dumb.
That's too bad because Hibbert has improved immensely this year, and he is a guy with cinder block feet.
I'd like to see this plan implemented, but I am not a fan of Iggy at the 2. He is a not a 2. Simple as that. He is a swiss army knife 3. We need a 2 who can stroke it and defend.
Jrue should be getting as many minutes as possible at this point and I'm all for the throwing Thad and Spieghts to the slaughter defensively plan.
I'd like to see McKie coach too, or Eric Snow. Tiny PGs usually make good coaches. He could be our Avery Johnson or Nate McMilian.
Speights is not being dumb by playing one-dimensional basketball. He is playing like his current coach wants him to play and earning big minutes because of it. Again, If I'm the coach, I tell him "Defend of sit."
He played like this last year...
If you remember, that's what DiLeo did with him last year, and it did pay dividends eventually. All of that was washed down the drain when Jordan was brought in, though. There's no correlation to defending and minutes on this roster right now.