We've got nothing but time on our hands, but that doesn't mean we can't keep ourselves busy. The season is over and done with, but there's plenty left to digest. Over the next month or so, we'll look at the season that was from a number of different angles, today is about housekeeping and awards.
First things first: All game capsules have now been completed, check out the
full schedule right here. The full rotation chart is complete (with all 87 games),
download it here and do what you will with it. And finally, the advanced stats worksheet has been updated,
download it here.
Finally, the awards:
Most Improved Player: Hands down, this is Jrue. He was all promise in his rookie season, this year he was a player. There were ups and downs, but as a 20-year-old he did much more good than harm, won a handful of games for the Sixers and dominated at times. The sky is the limit for Jrue. He's also the runaway winner of the "reason for hope" award. Jodie was runner-up.
Bounce-back: Closer than you might think, but I'm going with Thad. Brand has a legit claim, but I think Thad's return from the abyss was more dramatic. Somehow, it's like Thad's second and third years never happened. He looked like a more polished version of the guy we all fell in love with as a rookie. I'm not sure exactly how he projects for the future, it may be that this role is his ideal fit and they'll never get more than this out of him. If that's the case, and they can sign him to a reasonable contract, that's probably enough. He changes games off the bench with his speed and athleticism, that's a valuable commodity. Brand was runner-up.
Sixth-man-of-the-year: I'm going with Lou. He made me shake my head about 10,000 times, but you really can't look at his season objectively and say he did anything less than exactly what was asked of him. It's rare for a gunner to take exceptional care of the ball, but that's exactly what Lou did. He scored in bunches off the bench, he carried the offense through dry spells, he got to the line, and he took care of the ball. Thad was runner-up.
MVP: Brand. Iguodala was unbelievable defensively this year, and he put up excellent overall numbers, but he missed too many games. Brand played 81, some of them hurt, and he never really wore down. Coming into the year, the Sixers really had zero bigs they could count on for any kind of production, Brand righted the ship and really carried the team for long stretches. Basically, no matter who he was paired with in the front court, he had to cover for them in one area or another. He provided the team with a viable threat in the half court and consistent scoring whenever they needed it. Brand wasn't without his flaws (18% defensive rebounding rate, to name one), but he was definitely the most valuable. Iguodala was runner-up.
Biggest disappointment: Turner. Despite the glimpse we got of the player we hope he'll be in the playoffs, he still showed very, very little this year. He was supposed to be the most NBA-ready guy in the draft, he was supposed to be the shooting guard of the future, he was supposed to make an impact from day one. Now, we have to hope he'll make an impact from season two and we're left with reminders that it took him a long time to adjust at every level. Whether you're buying it or not is up to you, the one thing that's clear is that he's got a lot of work to do. Speights is your runner up, though I wasn't expecting a whole lot from him anyway.
Biggest waste of money: Easily the most competitive category. Hawes was on his rookie contract, so he's out, which leaves Kapono, Songaila and Nocioni. Songaila basically did absolutely nothing for his money. Nocioni played well in a couple of games. Kapono takes this one down for actually costing the Sixers a decent amount in his 111 minutes of game action. The former three-point king shot a dramatic 1/8 from distance on the season and missed a wide-open corner three that probably made the difference between losing to Miami in the first round and having a decent shot at beating Boston (OK, that's not completely fair, but Kapono was garbage).
Your award winners in the comments, and check out the spreadsheets available for download above.
Trivia question:
Who were the three best and three worst +/- players for the Sixers in the payoffs against the Heat?
If you want to cheat the answer is here:
http://www.nba.com/statistics/plusminus/plusminus_sort.jsp?pcomb=1&season=42010&split=9&team=76ers
And regular season:
http://www.nba.com/statistics/plusminus/plusminus_sort.jsp?pcomb=1&season=22010&split=9&team=76ers
As for your awards, I agree with all of them except 6th man. I give it to Young. He was the guy other teams were making changes to try and account for. Although Lou deserves credit for the sppark he provided. If only his FG percentage was a bit closer to the 47% in 2009/10.
Most Improved: Jrue
Comeback: Brand
6th man: Thad
MVP: Brand
Biggest Disappointment: Lou. Worst field goal percentage on the team (among the regulars, thus not counting Kapono), yet biggest gunner on the team. That's a deadly combo, and not in a good way. Not sure if playoffs count, but he shot 32.7% in the playoffs, and I'm not of the opinion that one shot erases 74 minutes of otherwise terrible play. I won't even get into his all-league (worst) defense.
Biggest Waste of Money: Nocioni (mainly because he wasn't even brought in as an expiring).
Yeah, another season of Noce is disappointing. I'd much rather be paying Sam that money (and he was an expiring.)
That Sam for Noce/Hawes deal was so bad on so many levels. Probably the worst move Stefanski has made- as all of his other moves at least made some sense at the time.
Wasn't the Sam trade all about the 2010/11 tax level and getting under it?
Yep, and it was a premature move, before they even knew how what the tax level would be.
So while a terrible move and premature it did sucessfully (it seems) accomplish the goal - which was not basketball related. I mean was it a bad move? Sure it was. But it achieved Comcasts (it seems) off court goal.
It was stupid to make a move before the level was set - the prediction of course was that it was going down - but maybe the kings said now or never (cause they're run by more attentive business folks and KNEW the cap wasn't going down as much as predicted?)
But I'd argue it was not the only way to shave a few mill off of their roster. Heck, they could have saved more money simply by trading back 2 picks in the draft...
It's the way they wanted to save money - and don't forget - Sam was a 'locker room problem'.
So they saved money and get rid of a 'troublemaker'
Yeah, but I never had a problem with moving Sam. he was unlikely going to be a long term Sixer.
It was sort of like the Miller situation. Losing the player was not nearly as much of an issue as lacking a viable replacement. But they lucked out with Jrue. No one in sight to replace Sam.
I had a problem with the move they made with sam for the reasons you stated there. It was a bad basketball move - and they got the worse talent - hands down. They got stuck with Nocioni for an extra year and forced to decide on a still unproven Hawes.
It wasn't a good trade, but Dalembert is a loser - I have no problem with them dumping his ass.
Stefanski has been disenfranchised, they weren't going to re-sign him and anyone who thinks they'll make a play for him this summer needs to remove their head from their ass. It's time to move on.
I don't have a problem with the idea of rolling the dice on Hawes, but it wasn't worth the extra year of Nocioni.
Hmmm...so if Dalembert is a loser (and at least you spelled it right, which is rare on the internet) what the hell does that make hawes, who is much worse than Sam at basketball and a lot more was expected of him.
So you dump a guy with a loser attitude and replace him with a worse game and a similar reputation as having a loser attitude. The only reason people did not know about's Hawes reputation for not caring about improving his game and being unbelievably soft is that people had not followed his career.
Every bad thing we said about Sam was said by King's fans about Hawes. So to replace one problem with a bigger one is not exactly progress. You don't solve problems by creating bigger ones. That is basically making moves for the sake of making moves.
I had/have no problem with moving Dalembert just to move him. He puts up numbers that tease you, but he's so inconsistent that he doesn't help you win. Combine that with the fact that he's dillusional about his offensive abilities and his time here had run its course.
Despite the sarcasm, he was a problem off the court. His work ethic was questionable, he's never happy with his role, etc, etc.
Hawes sucked, I wouldn't re-sign him.
Well - Dalembert did help you win. He did something very well that the sixers did very poorly (especially against the heat) in this tricky little thing called rebounding.
If work ethic is questionable does that mean you hate Thad too? What has thad improved in since his rookie year? Not a whole helluva lot, he can't rebound either.
As for the locker room bs, I'm still calling it BS, because it sounds more like an excuse the team can use and not really have to prove.
The sam trade was STUPID, except for the fact that it saved the sixers luxury tax (at the time)
What did the Sixers win with Dalembert? What did all of his "help" result in?
No, I'm not a big Thad fan - definitely afraid that they will overpay him this summer.
The trade sucked b/c of what they got back, not b/c of what they gave up.
MVP: Brand (Old reliable)
Most improved: Meeks
6th man: Thad
MVF (most valuable fan): Colonel Sanders
Most annoying: Hawes
Toughest: Nocioni
Best hair in a supporting role: Hawes
Best hair in a supporting role by a coach: Quin Snyder
BOSSiest: Lou
Most likely to "eat cake": Lou
Most likely to raise the roof: Jrue
Best dressed: Brackins in his inactive suit
Biggest doghouse and shortest leash: Speights
Best nap (top 10): Speights
Best nap by a non-player: Eric Snow
Best Twitter: #freeSpeezy
Lamest catch phrase: #showyaluv
Most broken jumper: tie
Best late game/OT performer: the opposition?
lol
Haha these are great. Totally agree that "#showyaluv" needs to be abandoned immediately.
The worst was when Zumoff started yelling "Show Ya Luv!" after a big run by the Sixers late in the season. Vomit-inducing.
The Mayor would have put a stop to that.
Brian, can we have a like button for posts like this?? Just about perfect, although I would argue the best shot was LouWill's hungover game tying three vs the Kings..and that one of these two guys from the Easter game should be fan of the year: http://twitpic.com/4t3p78
Best defensive play: Jrue Holiday's block on Josh McRoberts
Best offensive play: Lou's game winner vs. Miami
you guys don't seem to get the point of "#showyaluv. The players themselves knew it was cheesy. It was a joke, it was always supposed to be a joke. What it did was bond the team, and bonded the fans to the team (well at least more than we would've expected). To make fun of #showyaluv is just to say "I don't get it."
I don't care so much that the players did it. What was annoying and lame was the fans copying it and then Zumoff yelling it own in the middle of a game. Terribly embarrassing.