You Ain't Got No Alibi...Three wins, two losses. I've been chanting those four words to myself since the game ended to remind myself that the Sixers won a game they should've won tonight. That's a positive. Whenever the loop ends, I'm left with nagging thoughts about a lackluster performance in front of a pitiful crowd. Still, the Sixers came away with a 97-94 win over the depleted New Jersey Nets. Rotations, thoughts and a bonus graphic after the jump.
One benefit of watching a game entirely on DVR is that I can pause, rewind, and more accurately track something that strikes my fancy. Tonight, I decided to take a close look at where Elton Brand was getting the ball in the offense. I also wanted to track where Dalembert got the ball, to see if swapping their positions on the offensive end might make some sense. You'll notice the touches are color-coded by quarter and the totals are included. ![]() The dots in the charts represent where each player received a pass within the offense. This doesn't include offensive rebounds or loose balls, only where they were standing on the floor when they caught a pass. For the time being, forget that Brand was benched for the final 17+ minutes of the game, and let's just take a look at this chart. For the record, Brand was 4/7 for 8 points with 5 boards and 1 assist in 19 minutes of action. OK, now what does this chart tell you? The first thing that jumps out to me is that more than half of the time, Brand caught the ball in a position where he was not a threat. He was simply a way station for the ball as it passed from one perimeter player to another. Second, he got the ball on the low blocks twice. Once because he wound up with Terence Williams covering him on a switch (he got the ball, Sam's man left to help, he hit Sam with a nice pass for a dunk). The other time he quickly scored over Josh Boone with a nice lefty hook. He took a couple of those shots from the elbow, hitting two of them. I honestly don't know what to make of this. The Sixers had a clear advantage in Brand vs. anyone who was guarding him, yet they refused to take advantage. He was little more than a decoy when he did get the ball. I'd understand a pattern like this if his shot was off, but he hit 4/7 from the floor. Meanwhile, Dalembert was essentially ignored on offense. When he did get the ball, he was in a position to make an easy play. This is good offense in my opinion. He only converted one of his three shots, but on the other hand, he only took three shots. The question I came in trying to answer was whether it would make sense to switch Brand and Sammy's responsibilities on the offensive end of the floor. The chart probably doesn't do a great job of depicting it, but Sam sets up on the blocks pretty much every time down the floor. The ballhandlers basically ignored him down there for most of the game, but what if the option down there was Brand instead? It's not like he's contributing anything catching the ball 28 feet from the hoop, Sammy could play that roll, all he needs to do is catch an uncontested pass, then hand it off to one of the guards. Whatever the problem is, coach, players or system, this team needs to find a way to get the ball to Brand in a position where he can do something with when they're in their half-court sets. Doubly so when he has a blatant mismatch, like they did tonight. Now let's take a look at the rotations: Two quick notes about the rotations, then I'll move on because I don't feel like banging that particular drum tonight. (1) There's no way Elton Brand deserved to be benched for the remainder of the game when he was taken out with 5:23 left in the third. He wasn't the reason for the -9 the starters suffered through to start the third. He wasn't exactly part of the solution, either, but he didn't deserve to be singled out. And as I said before, he was effective in his minutes on the floor. (2) The game was won/saved when Jordan put Dalembert into the game with 7:53 left in the fourth. This begs the question of why it took that long to get him back into the game, but Jordan realized the defense improved dramatically when he got Sammy back in there, and Sammy responded with game-changing play down the stretch. I jotted down a few notes during the game, here goes:
Player of The Game: Lou Team Record: 3-2 Up Next: @ Detroit, Sunday afternoon. 1 p.m. The Eagles play Sunday night, so no excuses. Three more quick notes:
Latest Posts• Twelve is Looming • More Distractions • Moving Day • There Is a Precedent • First-Person Report: Sixers vs. Pistons • At Least It Wasn't the Threes • Our Weakness is Weaker Than Yours • Thriving At the Two? • Eddie Jordan Confidence Meter (1/4 Seaso • The Day After • Sixers All Over NBA.com Video • First-Person Report: Sixers vs. NuggetsSearchBlogs in The NetworkSixers BlogsPassion and Pride Sixers 4 Guidos Liberty Ballers Recliner GM PhillyArena Heard In The Cheap SeatsSilver Dollar Slots | ||||||||||||||||
Like a few similar games last year, the Sixers barely showed up against a depleted opponent. Careless T.O.s, poor FT shooting, poor defensive rebounding (aside from the starting guards), settling for jumpers. All signs of lack of focus.
The difference was that they managed to win.
The reason the won was 3 pt shooting (8-16), something completely absent last year. This covered for their miserable effort. Also, Williams stepped up with 9 reb and 6 assists- so he gets my Andre Miller-lite player of the game.
Biggest head scratcher:
The 4th Qtr line-up of Speights-Kapono-Carney-Gree-Williams. If they grabbed a defensive rebound I missed it. My initial conclusion was EJ is on crack.
Whoaaaa! Now, don't go assumin' Jordan is hittin' the pipe between quarters. Iggy needed a catch-me-breath and the only alternative was he-who-shall-go-unnamed.
That lineup was the fourth-highest-scoring personnel grouping of the night, albeit tied for the second highest of points-given-up. Of the six highest-scoring personnel groupings of the night, any notice of who was a part of three of 'em?.. JK, point taken.
Kapono was a plus in this game, IMO. I wish he'd take 6 threes every game, to be honest with you. The times he kills you is when he's out there and not shooting. He did have 1 rebound too, so give the guy some credit :)
BTW, anyone notice both Thad and Sam made paases right to the opposing team for no reason? Not trapped or anything. Passed it to a Nets player as if he thought they were a Sixer (or where a Sixer should be.)
Yup. I love unforced turnovers. Iguodala had a really sloppy pass in the half court as well.
97-94, not 97-84. I guess we should feel lucky the Nets didn't dress 10 men.
Type-o. Fixed now, good eyes.
Don't have much to add but this:
Brian, it seems clear to me that you're really putting the blinders and noice-cancelling headphones on when you're doing your writeups this season. Ignoring all the yip-yip and writing clear and straight as you really see it, biases on the chain. Commendable. Keep it up.
In the mad rush to claim 'first!' ground for "predictions" guys are settling into some theme camps already, a handful of games in. For right or wrong, cognitive dissonance will hem them in for keeps.
It'll be interesting to see how the string plays out. EJ's methods? Well, there's a little more rope still left.
Hassell reminded me of the old pudgy guy that doesn!t get picked till last at the playground than goes on to abuse the young guys with every veteren trick in the book.Thad better learn to get more physical on defense,maybe next we can move him to 2 guard.
Brian, agree about Jason Smith. He looked more fluid out there. Less robotic. Good thing. Don't like the walking the ball up the floor with the athletes we have out there. Very disappointed with Thad so far in every part of his game. His game may not match this system. I'd consider moving him for a young player who better fits with this system.
I think Thad should fit the system, it's just tough to figure. I want to see how he plays against Detroit then I'll dive into it a little more.
So tell me is Richard Jefferson's dunk more worthy of being #1 in the top ten for last night ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6ZMsZBNSxw&feature=channel
Iguodala got hosed.
He got second on ESPN - and might have been first if not for an obscenely good catch in the BSU LA Tech game
The best thing about last night's game besides the W is -- the headline of this article. Can't say much more because it says it all.
It was a very tough game to get excited about last night at the Wachovia. It began w/ Thad just playing horrendous and taking 50% of the shots. I agree with SFW that we need to consider moving him if things do not change soon. I know he is a favorite here but other than making some easy taps, he is really hurting us on the court these days. Being that I like Thad, I hope he gets it together real soon!
I think you give Willie Green to much positives, I believe they won inspite of him being on the court.
While it looks like Thad has caught a case of Willie-itis(and that's being nice), not sure he needs to be moved just yet. New system, new coach, new position.....Wait, that's too many alibi's.
Evaluation ongoing.
Btw, any correlation between Al Thornton beind demoted out of the starting lineup last night and Thad appearing to need the same? Just saying.
A. Well probably not since their different teams coaches and players.
B. Who would you suggest from the motley crew should start right now? Yes thad sucks right now but who is better and how is benching him better for the long term success of this team - you know like not playing Holliday may seem smart in the short term but in the long run it's asinine
I think Kate Fagan was onto something with a commment on Twitter during the game. His shot is off and it seems like it is a problem with his footwork. He is missing a lot of shots and last year he was a decent outside and 3 point shooter. He made some in year corrections last season and I hope he does the same here. We need him because he gets open shots.
Sarcasm detection appears to need some work.
I would say Carney as we would lose nothing Thad brings and maybe it would be a wake up call to Thad.
Just to make myself clear, I am not for trading Thad yet but if something comes up, he would be my first choice for a trade. Obviously, not a desperate move as he still may have a bright future and still is young :-).
While what Kate said re Thad is valid, it's just ONE of his many deficiencies. I wish all he was struggling with was shot mechanics.
I'm just worried about Thad because his passive play, playing to his weaknesses instead of his strengths, etc., is what he was knocked for as a college player, so, you know, one could hypothesize that this is the real Thad and rookie Thad was just the super-motivated Thad.
Not really sure if I'd go that far. Just remember how duly effective and efficient he was in that stretch of seven or so games the end of last year before he hurt his ankle against the Hawks. It looked like he was coming into his own right before our eyes. What happened to that guy?
Minute distribution means more to me than who actually starts. He would seem to flourish coming off the bench, IMO. Other choices to start - Kapono? Probably not, his scoring punch is needed off the bench. Carney? Maybe, he can play better defense than Thad is right now, can't he? And maybe knock down some of these open looks Thad is receiving within the sets.
yea i agree, if we can come into the came with 5 guys who can defend (we thought we would have that when thad was in the lineup but that did not pan out obviously), a lot of problems would go away.
besides a second unit of :
smith, speights, thad, kapono, and green/ivey (though i wish it was holiday), actually sounds really solid.
ej should definitely look into it (especially if it ends up lighting a fire under thad)